Thursday, January 19, 2012

For his 205th birthday - Robert E. Lee: A Tragic Figure in the American Experience (redux)

Watch the full episode. See more American Experience.

Greetings Cosmic Americans!

I have finally sat down to watch The American Experience: Robert E. Lee. Being the avid fan of well-done documentaries, I must say that I was not disappointed - at least not for the most part. We are treated to a mighty fine cast of historians providing the analytical commentary including Peter S. Carmichael, Joseph Glathaar, Gary W. Gallagher, Emory M. Thomas and a number of other first-rate scholars. PBS provides the narration and additional analysis - and as it turns out, a link to a streaming version! So watch and enjoy right here on Cosmic America! Oh, and by the way - you might want to watch the video (if you haven't already) before you continue reading. I wouldn't want to blow the ending.

The emphasis of Robert E. Lee is a move away from the deity in bronze or marble man image that the mighty general has ascended to since his death in 1870. The program paints the Virginia aristocrat as an altogether human figure. A human with an almost obsessive devotion to duty above all else, even family. The film walks us through the life of Lee as a young cadet at West Point, as Winfield Scott's trusted staffer in the War With Mexico, through a religious conversion experience, and as an ardent Confederate nationalist. He is irritable during the 1862-63 winter, at one point humiliating a subordinate in front of others. He experiences a bout of melancholy when he learns of family tragedy, and he suffers from an incapacitating heart condition. In other words - a man with emotions, faults, flaws, idiosyncrasies, and illness...just what we might expect of any other man.

Except that this is Robert E. Lee - and the film is very conscious of letting us know that many - both in the North and South - saw Lee as infallible...a virtuous, honorable soldier in a noble cause.

But Lee is a man who failed. He failed on an epic scale and saw everything that he stood for crumble. No one knew this better than Lee himself. So ultimately, Lee is a tragic figure. A man who on one hand was as virtuous as one can be, but who on the other saw no real problem with slavery and led an army to preserve it. In 1865, his country is defeated, his fortune is gone, his beloved Virginia is in ruins, and his family is only a shadow of what it once was. He spends the few remaining of his life in bitter private reflection.

And thus my critique of Robert E. Lee. The general narration of the film has a somewhat apologetic, even sorrowful tone - it seems to empathize with a man who has lost everything because of a devotion to duty. Do we then walk away from this film feeling as though Lee deserved better than what he got? Even Lee himself once stated that he wished he had not chosen the life of a soldier. Should we wish the same?

Lee is among the most compelling figures in American history. His brilliance and military acumen deserve accolades. But many have a difficult time reconciling this with the fact that a man of such great virtues committed treason against the nation he swore to protect - as does Robert E. Lee.

The film seems to poke a little at this nagging problem. The opening segments - "Lee" reading his pledge of allegiance to the United States as a young army officer bookended by a closing segment of a much older "Lee" reading his oath of loyalty to those same United States suggest that we should think more about his commitment to the national state.

In the end this is the real tragedy - that Lee, with all the promise of a brilliant career, cast his lot with what U. S. Grant would call "the worst cause for which a people ever fought, and one for which there was the least excuse." One could argue that he stood up to be counted in utter disregard of his devotion to duty - and thus turned his back on his nation and indeed - himself. In this the film only makes slight inroads - ones that perhaps are left for a future documentary.




  1. Scott A. MacKenzieJanuary 19, 2012 at 9:05 AM

    Anna Elizabeth Dickinson, the celebrated abolitionist and first woman to address Congress, refused to call him "General Lee." Instead, she spitefully called him "Lieutenant Colonel Lee" since that was his army rank before he betrayed his country.

  2. Keith,

    Excellent and thoughtful commentary on Lee.

    Really enjoyed it and like you, I hope there is a future commentary that will go into a bit more depth.


  3. "Even Lee himself once stated that he wished he had not chosen the life of a soldier. Should we wish the same?"
    As his generalship probably prolonged the war, at least in Virginia, I would definitely say yes.

  4. Keith - I thoroughly enjoy your writing and do hope you begin to pen more articles. It isn't often you hear the word "traitor" associated with Bobby Lee. I use it all the time. He was, as were all those who fought for/with him, a traitor in every sense of the word. I have no sympathy for the man or his family. He cast his lot with sedition and lost. If The South can hold a grudge against Sherman, I can certainly call Lee a traitor to his country. It will be interesting to see how American Experience handles John Brown. Will he be cast as a martyr or a murderer?

  5. Inspector - thanks for the comment. In regard to American Experience and JB, I hope they try and take a even handed approach to the man and the event. It is hard to cast a historical actor as all one thing or all the other.